Major Content Descriptions
|The Concise Definition|
Framework2 is a schema - the intersection between two historical classifications that have been in use for literally thousands of years. The first is the fundamentals of communication found in the primitive interrogatives: What, How, When, Who, Where, and Why. It is the integration of answers to these questions that enables the comprehensive, composite description of complex ideas. The second is derived from reification, the transformation of an abstract idea into an instantiation that was initially postulated by ancient Greek philosophers and is labeled in Framework2: Identification, Definition, Representation, Specification, Configuration and Instantiation.
Since The Zachman Framework classification was observed empirically in the structure of the descriptive representations (the architecture) of buildings, airplanes and other complex industrial products, there is substantial evidence to establish that The Zachman Framework is the fundamental structure for Enterprise Architecture and thereby yields the total set of descriptive representations relevant for describing an Enterprise.
The Zachman elaboration of Framework2 typically is depicted as a bounded 8 x 8 "matrix" with the Communication Interrogatives as columns and the Reification Transformations as rows. The Framework2 classifications are represented by the cells, that is, the intersection between the Interrogatives and the Transformations. This scheme would constitute the total set of descriptive representations that are relevant for describing something... anything: in particular an enterprise.
Pictured below is The Zachman elaboration of Framework2 as applied to all enterprises.
(To print your own, no cost, high resolution, personal-use copy, please sign up or log-in here:)
More specifically, Framework2 is an ontology - a theory of the existence of a structured set of essential components of an object for which explicit expressions is necessary and perhaps even mandatory for creating, operating, and changing the object (the object being an Enterprise, a department, a value chain, a "sliver," a solution, a project, an airplane, a building, a product, a profession or whatever or whatever).
The Framework is not a methodology for creating the implementation (an instantiation) of the object. Framework2 is the ontology for describing the Enterprise. The Framework (ontology) is a structure whereas a methodology is a process. A structure is NOT a process. A structure establishes definition whereas a process transforms inputs to outputs. Processes based on ontological structure will be predictable and produce repeatable results (for example, Chemistry, based on the Periodic Table). Conversely, Processes without ontological structures are ad hoc, fixed and dependent on practitioner skills (for example, Alchemy, based on trial and error).
The Framework2 is a derived from a metamodel and unlike a methodology, does not imply anything about:
The Framework2 is the basis for Architecture - We know what architecture is for industrial products (buildings, airplanes, locomotives, computers, etc., etc.) because in the Industrial Age, it was the industrial products that were increasing in complexity and the industrial products that were changing. If we had not gotten extremely sophisticated relative to architecture for industrial products, we would not likely be able to create and change complex industrial products and we would likely still be in the Industrial Age learning about Product Architecture.
Now that we are in the Information Age, it is the Enterprise that is increasing in complexity and the Enterprise that is changing. It is my opinion that Enterprise Architecture is the determinant of survival in the Information Age. Therefore, The Framework for Enterprise Architecture, The Zachman Framework, has some profound significance in putting definition around Enterprise Architecture, the survival issue of the Century. We have yet a LOT to learn about Enterprises, but I submit, The new Framework 2 would be a good place to start.
by John A. Zachman
Published and Edited by Stan Locke
© Copyright 2008 Zachman International & Zachman Framework Associates